We live in a sin-cursed world where false allegations abound. Yet, the worst mistake an accused person can make is to ignore them. When a fool makes reckless accusations, which challenges a person’s reputation, character, or witness, it’s important to uncover the weakness in their logic. So here’s my response to the allegations made.
My particular case is somewhat different than other criminal cases. It wasn’t a matter of not being able to prove it. I mean, evidence was in abundance. What made the difference was that the prosecution was trying to force the evidence to fit into their predetermined conclusion. The evidence told a different story then what the accuser wanted to tell. In fact, upon closer scrutiny of the evidence, the picture of the abuser is a reflection of the accuser. However, the police, detectives, investigators, and prosecutor had an agenda for which they served.
When my daughter, Addison, was first interviewed by the Children’s Advocacy Center, they wanted to ensure that she knew the difference between a truth and I lie. But after she told them that she would tell the truth, she voluntarily added that “if I don’t tell the truth, the judge will send me to juvenile.” While the interviewer and prosecution ignored this comment, my attorney made a startling discovery. Addison wasn’t standing before a judge or testifying in court, so how would she know that a judge would send her to juvenile, unless her testimony had been tampered with?
Then later, three neighbor boys had been interviewed and recorded by the Children’s Advocacy Center, and they all denied any sexual impropriety with me or my daughter. But when testifying before the Grand Jury, Detective Guerra of the Las Cruces police department, perjured his testimony by claiming that all the boys accused me.
But that’s nothing compared to when my attorney interviewed Addison. About half way through, she was questioned about some post-it notes that had a date and time written on them. She informed my attorney that the police needed proof. So mommy helped her make them for the police.
Now, if a person believes that the criminal justice system prosecutes lawbreakers, then my case makes no sense to them. (Why tamper with evidence? Why lie to the Grand Jury? Why frame an innocent man?) However, if you suspect that the criminal justice system is being used to tarnish my reputation with the full knowledge that this reputation would follow me into family court, now my case makes perfect sense. (It didn’t matter if the evidence had been tampered with. The state didn’t need those boys to testify in court. Let’s face it, they weren’t prosecuting me anyway, only smearing my reputation and character.)
And it worked beautifully for my ex-wife. In the beginning, all she started out with was an accusation but couldn’t support it. Later on, she walked into family court with the transcripts of the interview, my arrest record, my criminal charges, and the Grand Jury indictment – the proof she sought for so long.
So it came as no surprise when family court ruled against me and severed my child’s life support so they could recollect it in the form of child support payments. And that’s what my book exposes. Child support is a multi-billion dollar per year business, which explains why the criminal justice system was a co-conspirator with the family court system. They were working as one unit, and their sole motivation was money.
A Propaganda Campaign
Even before the allegations started, my ex-wife, Amy, had launched a propaganda campaign against me. And Addison was being primed. Here’s how it worked. Amy had severed my communication with my children long before the allegations. My phone calls, knocks on their door, and letters went unanswered. But a short time later, Amy’s attorney mailed me asking why I wasn’t involved with my family. She accused, “You’re making promises to visit your children, but when you don’t show, their disappointed not to see you.” In a later interview (after the allegations started), Addison accused me of promising to pick them up but not showing, and that made her sisters cry.
So we can deduce that Amy told my children that I said that I would stop over and pick them up at [designated time]…At the alleged time, the children were looking forward to seeing me and excitedly waiting for me…When that time came and went without my appearance, it broke my children’s heart. Amy could now comfort the children from the trauma that she just created. They never knew she was behind it, so it was effective at making them hostile towards me.
Addison mistakenly assumed that I promised to pick them up when I made no such promise. Her mind didn’t grasp that small detail that Amy told her that I promised. Through this method, Addison doesn’t believe she’s saying what Amy wants her to say, but rather, she’s saying what she believes to be true.
About a year and a half later, when Addison testified in family court, my attorney was drilling her to see if she could discern truth from error. She admitted that she could no longer remember. Her only source of “truth” was Amy. How tragic. Another victim of mind control – perpetrated by our government.
Striking Down the Home 